Loopholes in the Rape Laws – India

yesterday__s_feelings_by_littlemewhatever

No Apologies for such a crime.

Law is meaningless, when all men are good, and useless, when all men are bad. Fortunately or Unfortunately, Man is a mixture of the two which has necessitated the birth of law. Does it mean law is flawless because it happens to monitor, limit and control human behavior to an established set of patterns? Or is it that its authority could not be questioned as it happens to be supreme?

“Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it,” said Henry David Thoreau. After all Law is another creation of one man to pull strings of many men and thus can never be ideal. Flawlessness being a mirage in any human creation, even law has succumbed to cracks and crevices.

The Indian Penal Code too, sadly is haunted by gremlins and the provision relating to rape is one among them.

The Indian Penal Code is almost a century old. It was drafted by Thomas Babington Macaulay which came into operation on 1862. However, amendments did take place but not commendable ones.

Rape being one of the most heinous crimes in the world has been poorly dealt in the Indian Penal Law. The alarming increase in sexual offenses throughout the nation, it has become a matter of grave concern and hence requires a rapid amendments.

The definition of Rape according to section 375 is quite elaborate. The statute is as follows;-

375. Rape.– A man is said to commit” rape” who, except in the case hereinafter excepted, has sexual intercourse with a woman under circumstances falling under any of the six following descriptions:-

First – Against her will.

Secondly– Without her consent.

Thirdly– With her consent, when her consent has been obtained by putting her or any person in whom she is interested in fear of death or of hurt.

Fourthly- With her consent, when the man knows that he is not her husband, and that her consent is given because she believes that he is another man to whom she is or believes herself to be lawfully married.

Fifthly– With her consent, when, at the time of giving such consent, by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication or the administration by him personally or through another of any stupefying or unwholesome substance, she is unable to understand the nature and consequences of that to which she gives consent.

Sixthly– With or without her consent, when she is under sixteen years of age.

Explanation– Penetration is sufficient to constitute the sexual intercourse necessary to the offense of rape.

Exception– Sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape.

A saga of a helpless lady

Indian MarriageA judge in India has officially confirmed that rape laws do not apply to married couples — once you’re legally wed, forced sex is no longer a crime.

What’s especially chilling is that the judge, Virender Bhat, was hearing a case in which a woman alleged she had been drugged, then forced to marry, and then raped — in other words, she hadn’t consented to the marriage or the sex. Bhat said there was no evidence that the accuser had been drugged, but he also said that if the woman’s husband (identified only as Vikash) had forced himself on her, that wouldn’t qualify as rape under Indian law.

Here’s the official word:

The prosecutrix (the wife) and the accused (Vikash) being legally wedded husband and wife, and the prosecutrix being major, the sexual intercourse between the two, even if forcible, is not rape and no culpability can be fastened upon the accused.

Source: http://www.legallyindia.com

                 http://www.globalpost.com

 

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Loopholes in the Rape Laws – India

  1. That is screwed up,
    number 4: it´s just strange. With her consent when she thinks she is married to the man and the man knows she is not married to him? How does that happen. What is she a dummy or something.

    Penetration is sufficient to constitute rape? Quite obvious. But what about harassement, a guy just walks up touches her tits or other parts and then walks off happy go lucky?

    And the exception is particularly disturbing, first off married while 15, come on you´re just a kid at that age. And also, I get married with an Indian girl and I practically can do anything with her according to the laws in India, she doesn´t want to have it, I don´t care I´m your husband and I´m going to forcefully penetrate you everywhere. Seems to me woman there are like slaves once they married. And also doesn´t seem to me they have a whole bunch of freedom even if they are not married. Just screwed up all the way around.

  2. Married at 15 happens many places.. even here in the states. Not often, and it isn’t broadcasted, but it happens.. Trust me, I know.

    The touching and whatnot would be considered Sexual Harassment here and not rape, penetration is what defines rape.

    I think your rape laws are actually fairly similar to many I have read before, with the exception of the marriage making it no longer rape. That is ludicrous. Even if you are married, you shouldn’t be raped by anyone, including your husband.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s